Tag Archive for: spousal consent

Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

401(k) Plans, Distributions and Spousal Consent

 “Do 401(k) plans require the spouse of a plan participant to consent to a plan distribution?” 

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Minnesota is representative of a common inquiry related to distributions, spousal consent and 401(k) plans.

Highlights of Discussion

  • The short answer is, “maybe.” It depends on whether the 401(k) plan is subject to the annuity distribution requirements under the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 (REA) or is considered a “REA safe-harbor” plan.
  • REA, in part, provided spousal protections with respect to defined contribution (DC) plan distribution options, and defaulted most plan disbursements for married couples to qualified joint and survivor annuities (QJSAs) and qualified preretirement survivor annuities (QPSAs), unless the participant and spouse executed certain waivers.
  • 401(k) plans that are subject to the REA annuity mandates require plan administrators to obtain written spousal consent to distribute plan benefits in a form other than an annuity [Treasury Regulation (Treas. Reg.) 401(a)-20, Q&A 17]. REA added the requirement to have spousal consent to take a distribution so that the nonemployee spouse would have some control over the form of benefit the participant chooses and would be, at the very least, aware that retirement benefits existed.
  • Regs at 1.417(e)-1(b)(2) and 1.401(a)-20, Q&A 27 provide for the following spousal consent exceptions for REA plans:
  1. For distributions made on or after October 17, 2000, a spouse’s consent is not required if the present value of the participant’s nonforfeitable accrued benefit, including both employer and employee contributions, on the date of the distribution is ≤ $5,000;
  2. If the plan administrator is satisfied there is no spouse or the spouse cannot be located;
  3. If the participant has a court order certifying his or her abandonment; or is legally separated;
  4. If the spouse is incompetent, the legal guardian can provide consent, even if the legal guardian is the participant;
  5. The plan must make required minimum distributions even though the employee, or spouse where applicable, fail to consent to the distribution (see Treas. Reg.401(a)(9)-8, Q&A 4).
  • REA safe-harbor plans, in contrast, are DC plans that are drafted to be exempt from the REA annuity requirements. The plan document will state whether it is a REA safe-harbor plan. Many, but not all, 401(k) plans are REA safe-harbor plans. Plan administrators are not required to obtain spousal consent for a distribution if the 401(k) plan is a REA safe harbor plan.
  • The criteria to be a REA safe-harbor plan are found in Reg. 1.401(a)-20, Q&A 3:
  • At death, a participant’s vested benefit must be payable to the spouse unless the participant is not married or the spouse consents to another named beneficiary;
  • The plan participant cannot elect payments in the form of an annuity;
  • The plan administrator separately accounts for and continues to apply the REA rules to amounts transferred from other plans subject to the REA rules (e.g., money purchase pension plans or target benefit plans).

Conclusion

Some 401(k) plans are subject to REA and, therefore, require distributions to be in the form of an annuity unless the plan administrator obtains proper participant and spousal waivers. Some plans are REA safe-harbor and do not require the plan administrator to obtain spousal consent for a distribution. The terms of the plan document will specify what type of plan it is.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Retirement Plan Benefits and Prenuptial Agreements Do Not Mix

“My client asked me what effect, if any, a prenuptial agreement would have on 401(k) plan assets?

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with an advisor in California is representative of a common question related to spouses as retirement plan beneficiaries.

Highlights of Discussion

Generally, a prenuptial or antenuptial agreement  is an agreement made between a couple before they legally marry by which they forfeit future rights to each other’s property in the event of a divorce or death. The short answer is that a prenuptial agreement has no impact on a spouse’s claim to 401(k) plan assets because it does not satisfy the applicable spousal consent requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC §) 417(a)(2) and Treasury Regulation Section (Treas. Reg.) 1.401(a)-20, Q&A 28.

In most cases, spousal consent is required before a plan can pay out benefits in a form other than a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity. The Retirement Equity Act of 1984 (REA) added the mandate to obtain spousal consent before a plan participant could take a distribution so that the nonemployee spouse would have some control over the form of benefit the participant chose, and would, at the very least, be aware that retirement benefits existed. There are exceptions to the spousal consent rule when

  1. The payable benefit is ≤ $5,000;
  2. There is no spouse or the spouse cannot be located;
  3. The spouse has been legal abandoned or the couple is legally separated;
  4. The spouse is incompetent; or
  5. The plan must satisfy requirement minimum distribution rules.

Even if a 401(k) plan is drafted as a “REA Safe Harbor Plan” (meaning it meets the criteria to be exempt from the QJSA requirements)[1], the spouse must generally consent in writing to the naming of anyone other than the spouse as primary beneficiary.

For its reasoning on antenuptial agreements, the IRS relied on several court cases, which found that the antenuptial agreements were not valid because, in part, they were signed by the participant’s fiancée (not spouse), and the agreements did not comply with REA since they did not specify the nonspouse beneficiary who would receive the benefit [See Hurwitz v. Sher, 982 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 912 (1993) and Nellis v. Boeing Co., No. 911011, 15 E.B.C. 1651 (D.Kan. 5/8/1992)].

Conclusion

Based on numerous court cases and Treasury Regulations, the IRS has made it clear that a prenuptial agreement has no impact on a spouse’s claim to 401(k) plan assets.

 

[1] Treas. Reg. 1.401(a)-20, Q&A 3

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved