Tag Archive for: Life Insurance

Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

What Are PS 58 Costs?

“My client has life insurance in her 401(k) plan. Her accountant told her that the “PS 58 costs” are taxable to her.  Can you explain?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business. A recent call with an advisor in Illinois involved a case related to life insurance.

Highlights of Discussion

Your client’s accountant is correct. If the plan uses deductible employer contributions to purchase life insurance for her, then the cost of the protection (the premium paid) is included in her gross income [Treas. Reg. § 1.72-16(b)(2)].  The cost of this coverage is called the “PS 58 cost,” and is includible in income for the taxable year during which the plan pays the premium.

The plan administrator reports the taxable cost of life insurance (the PS 58 cost) annually on Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., even when there has been no physical distribution from the plan. Since these amounts have already been taxed, they create a basis in the plan. That means your client will not be taxed again on the cumulative PS 58 costs when the insurance contract is distributed to her or when the life insurance proceeds are distributed to her beneficiaries.

Conclusion

If the plan uses deductible employer contributions to purchase life insurance for a participant, then the cost of the protection (PS 58 cost) is reported on Form 1099-R. The participant must include the amount in taxable income for the year the premium is paid.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Retirement and life insurance in a qualified retirement plan

“My client has a life insurance policy inside his profit sharing plan at work. He will be retiring soon. Can he leave the policy in the plan after retirement?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Wisconsin is representative of a common inquiry related to life insurance in qualified retirement plans.

Highlights of the Discussion

No, the IRS says a life insurance policy cannot remain in a plan past the plan participant’s retirement or separation from service (Revenue Rulings 54-51 and 74-307).[1] The reasoning for this relates to the IRS’s rules that holding life insurance in a qualified retirement plan is OK as long as the death benefits are “incidental,” meaning they must be secondary to other plan benefits.

Death benefits are considered incidental if the plan meets two conditions: 1) employer contributions used to purchase coverage are limited as prescribed; and 2) the plan requires the trustee to convert the entire value of a life insurance contract at or before retirement into cash, provide periodic income so that no portion of the policy may be used to continue life insurance protection beyond retirement, or distribute the contract to the participant (IRS Publication 6392, Explanation #4, Miscellaneous Provisions.)  Participants and their financial advisors should check the terms of their retirement plan documents to see what the plan language dictates.

Regarding the contribution limits, life insurance coverage in a defined contribution plan is considered incidental if the amount of employer contributions and forfeitures used to purchase whole or term life insurance benefits are limited to 50 percent for whole life, and 25 percent for term policies. No percentage limit applies if the participant purchases life insurance with company contributions held in a profit sharing plan for two years or longer.

Conclusion

The incidental benefit rules that apply to holding life insurance in a qualified retirement plan prevent the plan from retaining the policy past a participant’s retirement.

[1] See www.legalbitstream.com

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Plan Compensation and Imputed Income

“What is imputed income and how does it affect a 401(k) plan, if at all?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings plans. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Virginia is representative of a common inquiry related to compensation.

Highlights of Discussion

Imputed income relates to group term life insurance (GTLI). Offering GTLI may affect the administration of an employer’s qualified retirement plan, depending on the definition of compensation selected for plan purposes.

The first $50,000 of employer-provided GTLI is excludable from an employee’s taxable income pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC) §79. Once the amount of coverage exceeds $50,000, the imputed cost of coverage, based on the IRS Premium Table, is subject to income, Social Security and Medicare taxes (see IRS Publication 15-B). The imputed income is considered a taxable fringe benefit to the employee.

An employer must report the amount as wages in boxes 1, 3, and 5 of an employee’s Form W-2, and also show it in box 12 with code “C.” At an employer’s discretion, it may withhold federal income tax on the amount.

As taxable income, the amount may be included in the definition of compensation that is specified in the governing documents of an employer’s retirement plan. For example, with respect to the safe harbor definitions of compensation that plans may use, treatment of imputed income is as follows.

Compensation Type Form W-2 3401(a) 415 Safe Harbor
Taxable premiums for GTLI Included Excluded Included

 

Conclusion

Imputed income from GTLI coverage may be includible compensation for retirement plan administrative purposes. Employers and plan administrators must always refer to the specific definition of compensation elected in the plan document to know when to include or exclude imputed income.

 

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Life Insurance in Qualified Plans

I’ve heard that sponsors of qualified retirement plans can offer life insurance as a type of investment within the plan. If that is true—what are the requirements to do so?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs and qualified retirement plans. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.  A recent call with a financial advisor in Colorado is representative of a question we commonly receive related to life insurance in qualified plans.

Highlights of Discussion

While life insurance is prohibited within IRAs, it is true that some qualified plans permit participants to purchase life insurance with a portion of their individual accounts within their workplace retirement plans. [See Treasury Regulation §§1.401-1(b)(1)(i) and (ii).]

If life insurance is offered as an investment within a retirement plan, the following are some critical points to keep in mind.

Death benefits must be “incidental,” meaning they must be secondary to other plan benefits. For defined contribution plans, life insurance coverage is considered incidental if the amount of employer contributions and forfeitures used to purchase whole or term life insurance benefits under a plan are limited to 50 percent for whole life, and 25 percent for term policies. No percentage limit applies if the participant purchases life insurance with company contributions held in a profit sharing plan for two years or longer. [See IRS Revenue Ruling 54-51  and PLR 201043048.

For a defined benefit plan, life insurance coverage is generally considered incidental if the amount of the insurance does not exceed 100 times the participant’s projected monthly benefit.

If the plan uses deductible employer contributions to pay the insurance premiums, the participant will be taxed on the current insurance benefit. This taxable portion is referred to as the P.S. 58 cost. Insurance premiums paid by self-employed individuals are not deductible.

A participant with a life insurance policy within a retirement plan, generally, may not roll over the policy (but he or she may swap out the policy for an equivalent amount of cash, and roll over the cash).

Participants may exercise nonreportable “swap outs.” In a life insurance swap out, the participant pays the plan an amount equal to the cash value of the policy in exchange for the policy itself. This transaction allows the participant to distribute the full value of his or her plan balance (including the cash value of the policy), and complete a rollover, while allowing the participant to retain the life insurance policy outside of the plan.

Swap Out Example:

Anne has a life insurance contract in her 401(k) plan with a face value of $150,000, and a cash value of $25,000. She elects to swap out the policy and gives the administrator a check for $25,000. In return, the administrator reregisters the insurance policy in Anne’s name (rather than in the plan’s name), and distributes the contract to her. There is no taxable event and Anne may take a distribution (once she has a triggering event) and roll over the entire amount received if that is in her best interest.

Conclusion

It is possible that a qualified retirement plan may allow participants to invest in life insurance under the plan. Check the terms of the document to determine whether it is an option and follow the incidental benefit rules.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
placeholder
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Valuing Life Insurance

 

“Is there any guidance on valuing a life insurance contract distributed from a 401(k) plan?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs and qualified retirement plans. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

Highlights of Discussion

  • Fortunately, there is.  The IRS has provided safe harbor rules for determining the fair market value of life insurance contracts distributed from a qualified retirement plan in Revenue Procedure (Rev. Proc.) 2005-25.
  • Under Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC §) 402(a), amounts distributed to a plan participant, generally, are taxable in the year in which they are paid to the employee.
  • Treasury regulations (Treas. Regs.) provide that the cash value of any retirement income, endowment or other life insurance contract is includible in gross income at the time of the distribution [Treas. Reg. § 1.402(a)-1(a)(2)].
  • However, sometimes the stated cash surrender value of a contract does not accurately reflect its actual fair market value.  In Rev. Proc. 2004-16, which was superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-25, the IRS provides a formulaic approach to valuing a life insurance contract. The IRS issued the rev. procs. primarily to address the issue of a “springing cash value plan,” a policy in which, for the first few years, the cash surrender value of the policy is much lower than the value of the premiums paid or the reserve accumulations (Internal Revenue Manual 4.72.8.5.3).
  • Plan sponsors should ensure providers of life insurance contracts and plan record keepers are following the guidance of Rev. Proc. 2005-25 when determining the fair market value of a distributed life insurance contract.

 

Conclusion

Sometimes the stated cash surrender value of a life insurance contract does not accurately reflect its actual fair market value. Rev. Proc. 2005-25 provides a safe harbor means to calculate the fair market value of life insurance contracts.

 

 

 

© 2017 Retirement Learning Center, LLC

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved