Tag Archive for: safe harbor

Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

A SIMPLE Switch

Can I terminate my SIMPLE IRA plan and start a 401(k) plan mid-year?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Minnesota is representative of a common inquiry related to SECURE Act 2.0 of 2022 (SECURE 2.0).

Highlights of the Discussion

That’s a straightforward question that, currently, has a problematic answer due to the “exclusive plan rule,” which says the SIMPLE must be the only plan the business maintains for the year. Problem solved—thanks to SECURE 2.0 for plan years beginning after December 31, 2023.

For the 2024 plan year and later plan years, employers may replace their SIMPLE IRA plans mid-year with what we will call an “eligible 401(k) replacement plan.” The annual deferral limits are different for the two plan types. Therefore, under the new rules, the participant’s annual deferral limit will be prorated (by day) between the SIMPLE IRA plan and the eligible 401(k) replacement plan for the year.

An eligible 401(k) replacement plan, for this purpose, is a

  • SIMPLE 401(k),
  • Safe Harbor 401(k),
  • 401(k) with a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (QACA), or
  • Starter 401(k) (new under SECURE 2.0).

 

Eligible 401(k) Replacement Plan Key Characteristics
A SIMPLE 401(k)
  • Employer has 100 or fewer employees
  • Must be the only plan maintained by the employer
  • Must file a Form 5500 annually
  • Voluntary employee deferrals
  • Mandatory employer contributions (generally, 3% match or 2% nonelective)
  • Immediate vesting for contribution types
  • Additional information at IRS SIMPLE 401k facts
Safe Harbor 401(k)
  • No limit on number of employees
  • Voluntary employee deferrals
  • Mandatory employer contributions—3 options
  1. Basic match: 100% percent match on deferrals up to 3% of compensation and a 50% match on deferrals between 3% and 5%
  2. Enhanced match:  At least equal to the aggregate match under the basic match formula (e.g., 100% match on deferrals of 4% compensation) or
  3. A 3% nonelective contribution
QACA 401(k)
  • No limit on number of employees
  • Automatic enrollment of at least 3% with automatic escalation of at least 1% annually after the initial period, to at least 6% up to a maximum of 15%
  • Mandatory employer contributions—2 options
  1. Matching contribution: 100% match on deferrals up to 1% of compensation and a 50% match on deferrals between 1% to 6% of compensation; or
  2. A 3% nonelective contribution
  • Two-year vesting schedule could apply to employer contributions
  • Standard Form 5500 filing rules apply
  • Additional information IRS QACA facts
Starter 401(k)

Available for plan years after December 31, 2023

  • For employers without a qualified plan
  • Must be the only plan maintained by the employer
  • No limit on the number of employees
  • Automatic enrollment at 3% up to 15% of compensation
  • Deferrals limited to the annual IRA contribution limit (i.e., $6,000 indexed, plus $1,000 in catch-up indexed)
  • No employer contributions
  • Standard Form 5500 filing rules apply

What’s more, SECURE 2.0 will help SIMPLE IRA plan participants who are experiencing a mid-year plan switch, overcome another, potentially expensive, hurdle. Currently, SIMPLE IRA participants cannot roll over the assets from their SIMPLE IRAs to another plan within the first two years of participation without incurring a 25 percent penalty, unless they have a penalty exception (e.g., age 59 ½). During the initial two-year participation period participants can only transfer money to another SIMPLE IRA. SECURE 2.0 will waive that penalty starting with the 2024 plan year in certain circumstances. If an employer terminates a SIMPLE IRA plan and establishes a 401(k) plan (or, for rollover purposes, a 403(b) plan), rollovers between the SIMPLE IRAs to the new 401(k) plan are allowed if the rolled amount is subject to 401(k) distribution restrictions (e.g., age 59 ½, death, severance of employment, hardship, etc.).

Through the 2023 plan year, however, the current SIMPLE IRA rules are in place. Consequently, if an employer maintains another plan during the same year it has a SIMPLE IRA plan, the employer violates the exclusive plan rule and invalidates the SIMPLE IRA plan, technically, making all contributions to the SIMPLE IRA excess contributions. According to the IRS’s, SIMPLE IRA Plan Fix-It Guide, which is based on its Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS), the business owner may be able to file a Voluntary Correction Program (VCP) submission requesting that contributions made for previous years in which more than one plan was maintained remain in the employees’ SIMPLE IRAs. User fees for VCP submissions are generally based upon the current value of all SIMPLE IRAs that are associated with the SIMPLE plan. Self-correction is not available for this type of error. Further correction information is available here.

Options for 2023 when considering a mid-year plan switch from a SIMPLE IRA plan

  • Wait to start a new 401(k) plan until January 1, 2024, providing required notices prior.
  • If a switch to a 401(k) plan is made mid-year 2023, contemplate a VCP filing.

Options for 2024 when considering a mid-year plan switch from a SIMPLE IRA plan

  • Wait to start a new 401(k) plan until January 1, 2025, providing required notices prior.
  • Take advantage of the SECURE 2.0 change and adopt one of the eligible 401(k) replacement plans.

Conclusion

For 2023, switching from a SIMPLE IRA plan to another plan type mid-year is problematic, and may involve an IRS VCP filing (with fees). SECURE 2.0 provides relief for 2024 and later years for this scenario when adopting an eligible 401(k) replacement plan.

 

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Is There Still Time for a Safe Harbor Plan for 2022?

“My client, who has a traditional 401(k) plan, would like to change to a safe harbor plan for 2022. Is it too late to do that?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Illinois is representative of a common inquiry related to safe harbor plans.

Highlights of the Discussion
It still may be possible for your client to have safe harbor plan with a nonelective contribution for 2022. December 1st is a key deadline—but there is also another option if she misses that deadline. The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of 2019 relaxed the deadline for amending a 401(k) plan to add a safe harbor nonelective contribution.

Under Section 103 of the SECURE Act, plan sponsors may amend their plans to add a three percent (3%) safe harbor nonelective contribution at any time before the 30th day before the close of the plan year. The SECURE Act also did away with the mandatory participant notice requirement for this type of amendment.

Furthermore, amendments after that deadline would be allowed if the amendment provides

1) a nonelective contribution of at least four percent (4%) of compensation for all eligible employees for that plan year,

and

2) the plan is amended no later than the close of following plan year.

(See Issue Snapshot – Notice Requirement for a Safe Harbor 401(k) or 401(m) Plan)

EXAMPLE:

Safety First, Inc., maintains a calendar-year 401(k) plan. Based on the plan’s preliminary actual deferral percentage (ADP) test (which doesn’t look good), Safety First decides a safe harbor plan is a good idea for 2022. It’s too late to add a safe harbor matching contribution for 2022. However, the business could add a 3% safe harbor nonelective contribution for the 2022 plan year (without prior participant notice) as long as Safety First amends its plan document prior to December 1, 2022. While Safety First still could add a nonelective safe harbor contribution to the plan for 2022 after that date, the minimum contribution would have to be at least 4% of compensation, and the company would have to amend its plan document no later than December 31, 2023.

Conclusion

Thanks to the SECURE Act, 401(k) plan sponsors have more flexibility to amend their plans for “safe harbor” status. Plan sponsors who are failing their actual deferral percentage (ADP) tests for the year may find this type of plan amendment attractive as a correction measure

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
rules
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Top Heavy Safe Harbor Plans

“One of my clients has a safe harbor 401(k) plan and his recordkeeper told him the plan was top heavy. How could that be? I thought all safe harbor plans were exempt from the top-heavy testing rules.”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Florida is representative of a common inquiry related to safe harbor 401(k) plans.

Highlights of Discussion

No—not all safe harbor plans are exempt from the top-heavy rules.

A safe harbor plan that provides for salary deferrals and just the required safe harbor contribution (i.e., either the employer matching or nonelective contribution) would be exempt from top-heavy testing. However, there are three scenarios that would make a safe harbor plan subject to top-heavy testing, according to Revenue Ruling 2004-13:

  1. If, in addition to employee salary deferrals and the employer’s safe harbor contribution, the plan allocates an additional profit-sharing contribution;
  2. If the plan allocates forfeitures as a profit sharing contribution; and
  3. If employees are eligible to make elective deferrals upon hire but are not eligible for matching contributions until after they complete one year of service.

If your client’s safe harbor plan falls under one of the three above-listed exceptions, then the plan will have to be tested for top-heaviness. In general, a plan is considered top heavy if more than 60 percent of the plan’s assets belong to key employees. A top-heavy plan must satisfy minimum contribution and vesting requirements (see Treasury Regulation 1.416, Q&A Sections V and M).

Here are a couple of extra pointers regarding the minimum contribution requirement for safe harbor plans that fail top-heavy testing:

  • Safe harbor employer contributions can be used to help satisfy the minimum contribution requirement for a top-heavy plan.
  • When determining the top-heavy minimum contribution amount, the plan must use “full year compensation,” regardless of how the plan document defines compensation for contribution purposes (see Treasury Regulations 1.416-1, Q&As M-7 and T-21).

Conclusion

Not all 401(k) safe harbor plans are exempt from top-heavy testing. The IRS has identified three scenarios in which safe harbor plans would be required to apply the test and, if found to fail, meet minimum contribution and vesting requirements.

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Definition of Compensation When Safe Harbor Match Eliminated Mid Year

“The company is a safe harbor 401(k) match plan and they pay the match in a lump sum after the plan year.  The company amended the plan to remove the safe harbor matching contribution mid-year. What definition of compensation should the plan use to determine the amount of match to make—full year or partial year?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Ohio is representative of a common inquiry related to the definition of compensation.

Highlights of the Discussion

The IRS has provided guidance in treasury regulations  as follows.

“A plan that is amended during the plan year to reduce or suspend safe harbor contributions (whether nonelective contributions or matching contributions) must pro rate the otherwise applicable compensation limit under section 401(a)(17) in accordance with the requirements of § 1.401(a)(17)–1(b)(3)(iii)(A).”

Consequently, when a safe harbor 401(k) reduces or suspends the matching contribution mid-year via amendment, the plan would use prorated compensation to determine the amount of match to make for the shortened period of time the match is given.

However, because the plan is no longer a safe harbor plan, it must be amended to provide that the actual deferral percentage (ADP) test and actual contribution percentage (ACP) tests will be satisfied for the entire plan year in which the reduction or suspension occurs using the current year testing method described in §1.401(k)–2(a)(2)(ii).  Therefore, the plan would be required to use full year compensation to run the ADP and ACP tests [see Treas. Reg. Sections 1.401(k)-3(g)(1)(iv) ].

Conclusion

Using the correct definition of compensation for plan purposes is one of the top compliance concerns of the IRS. This hurdle is confounded even further when plans realize more than one definition of compensation may apply depending on the circumstance.

 

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
new rules
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Still Time for a 2020 Nonelective Safe Harbor Plan?

“Although it is already November, can my client amend her traditional 401(k) plan to be a safe harbor plan for 2020?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Illinois is representative of a common inquiry related to safe harbor plans.

Highlights of the Discussion

Yes, but she must hurry. The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of 2019 relaxed the deadline for amending a 401(k) plan to add a safe harbor nonelective contribution for the current year.

Under Section 103 of the SECURE Act, plan sponsors may amend their plans to add a three percent safe harbor nonelective contribution at any time before the 30th day before the close of the plan year. The SECURE Act also did away with the mandatory participant notice requirement for this type of amendment.

Furthermore, amendments after that time would be allowed if the amendment provides

1) a nonelective contribution of at least four percent of compensation for all eligible employees for that plan year,

and

2) the plan is amended no later than the close of the following plan year.

EXAMPLE:

Safety First, Inc., maintains a calendar-year 401(k) plan. Based on the plan’s preliminary actual deferral percentage (ADP) test (which the plan is failing), Safety First decides a safe harbor plan is a good idea for 2020. It’s too late to add a safe harbor matching contribution for 2020. However, the business could add a three percent safe harbor nonelective contribution for the 2020 plan year (without prior participant notice) as long as Safety First amends its plan document prior to December 1, 2020. While Safety First still could add a nonelective safe harbor contribution to the plan for 2020 after that date, the minimum contribution would have to be at least four percent of compensation, and the company would have to amend its plan document no later than December 31, 2021.

Conclusion

Thanks to the SECURE Act, 401(k) plan sponsors have more flexibility to amend their plans for “safe harbor” status. Plan sponsors who are failing their ADP tests for the year may find this type of plan amendment attractive as a correction measure.

 

 

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Reducing or Suspending 401(k) Safe Harbor Contributions Mid-Year under Notice 2020-52

An advisor calling RLC’s Resource Desk recently asked the following questions:  “My client is a business owner and has a standard 401(k) safe harbor plan.  Under what circumstances, if any, may he reduce or eliminate the company’s mandatory safe harbor contribution during the plan year? Is there any relief granted because of the impact of Covid-19?”   

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business. A recent call with a financial advisor from Washington is representative of a common inquiry related to 401(k) safe harbor plans.

Highlights of the Discussion

The following outlines the circumstances under which sponsors of 401(k) [and 403(b)] safe harbor plans may reduce or eliminate employer safe harbor contributions mid-year under normal circumstances, and under the special circumstances outlined in IRS Notice 2020-52 granted as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Under normal circumstances, and according to final Treasury Regulations, a sponsor of a 401(k) safe harbor plan may amend the plan during the current year to reduce or suspend the company’s safe harbor contribution—either the matching or nonelective contribution—under the following limited circumstances.

A removal or reduction of a safe harbor contribution mid-year is permitted if the employer either

  1. Is operating under an economic loss for the year (See Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC 412(c)(2)(A);[1]

or

  1. Included a statement in the safe harbor notice given to participants before the start of the plan year that the employer
  • May reduce or suspend contributions mid-year;
  • Will give participants a supplemental notice (described below) regarding the reduction or suspension; and
  • Will not reduce or suspend employer contributions until at least 30 days after receipt of the supplemental notice.

COVID-19 Relief Any Plan Amended Between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020

Any sponsor of a safe harbor plan may amend its plan between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020, to reduce or suspend safe harbor contributions (either match or nonelective) without condition. However, special rules related to the supplemental notice apply as explained next.

Supplemental Notice

Typically, if a reduction or suspension of safe harbor contributions will occur, a 30-day advance notice rule applies. This supplemental notice must explain 1) the consequences of the suspension or reduction of contributions; 2) how participants may change their deferral elections as a result; and 3) when the amendment takes effect.

COVID-19 Relief for Supplement Notice for Nonelective Contributions

Sponsors who reduce or suspend 401(k) safe harbor nonelective contributions will satisfy the 30-day supplemental notice requirement, provided the sponsor

  • Gives the notice to employees no later than August 31, 2020, and
  • Adopts the required plan amendment no later than the effective date of the reduction or suspension of safe harbor nonelective contributions.

There is no relief on the timing of the supplemental notice under Notice 2020-52 for sponsors who reduce or suspend safe harbor matching contributions. Sponsors must give 30 days notice via a supplemental notice to participants before the reductions can take place.

Other Procedural Requirements

Typically, an employer that suspends or reduces safe harbor contributions must also

  1. Give participants a reasonable opportunity after they receive the supplemental notice and before the reduction or suspension of employer contributions to change their contribution elections;
  2. Amend the plan to apply the actual deferral percentage (ADP) and/or actual contribution percentage (ACP) Tests for the entire plan year; and
  3. Allocate to the plan any contributions that were promised before the amendment took effect.

Additional Notice 2020-52 Relief: Mid-Year Safe Harbor Contribution Reductions for Highly Compensated Employees

Pursuant to Notice 2020-52, a plan sponsor may choose to reduce or suspend 401(k) safe harbor contributions for highly compensated employees (HCEs) alone. In such cases, the plan sponsor must provide an

  • Updated safe harbor notice and
  • Opportunity for participants to update their elections, determined as of the date of issuance of the updated safe harbor notice.

Conclusion

In the past, the ability of sponsors to amend their 401(k) [or 403(b)] safe harbor plans to reduce or suspend employer matching or nonelective safe harbor contributions mid-year was limited. The IRS expanded those opportunities under IRS Notice 2020-52 in order to provide relief in light of the Covid-19 pandemic.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Reducing or Suspending 401(k) Safe Harbor Contributions Mid-Year

“My client is a business owner and has a standard 401(k) safe harbor plan.  Under what circumstances, if any, may he reduce or eliminate the company’s mandatory safe harbor contribution during the plan year?”   

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center (RLC) Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare.  We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.

A recent call with a financial advisor from Washington is representative of a common inquiry related to 401(k) safe harbor plans.

Highlights of the Discussion

Under limited circumstances, and according to final Treasury Regulations, a sponsor of a 401(k) safe harbor plan may amend the plan during the current year to reduce or suspend the company’s safe harbor contribution—either the matching or nonelective contribution.

A removal or reduction of a safe harbor contribution mid-year is permitted if the employer either

  1. Is operating under an economic loss for the year (See Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC 412(c)(2)(A);

or

  1. Included a statement in the safe harbor notice given to participants before the start of the plan year that the employer
  • May reduce or suspend contributions mid-year;
  • Will give participants a supplemental notice regarding the reduction or suspension; and
  • Will not reduce or suspend employer contributions until at least 30 days after receipt of the supplemental notice.

Supplemental Notice

If a reduction or suspension will occur, the supplemental notice must explain 1) the consequences of the suspension or reduction of contributions; 2) how participants my change their deferral elections as a result; and 3) when the amendment takes effect.

Other Procedural Requirements

The employer must also

  1. Give participants a reasonable opportunity after they receive the supplemental notice and before the reduction or suspension of employer contributions to change their contribution elections;
  2. Amend the plan to apply the actual deferral percentage (ADP) and/or actual contribution percentage (ACP) Tests for the entire plan year; and
  3. Allocate to the plan any contributions that were promised before the amendment took effect.

Conclusion

With the proper set up, or as a result of economic loss, sponsors of 401(k) safe harbor plans may reduce or suspend employer matching or nonelective safe harbor contributions mid-year.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Annuity provider selection safe harbor for defined contribution plans

“Has the Department of Labor (DOL) issued guidance on how to prudently select annuity providers for a defined contribution (DC) plan?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, stock options, and Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business.  A recent call with a financial advisor from Massachusetts is representative of a common inquiry related to annuities within defined contribution plans.

Highlights of the Discussion

Yes, the DOL has described a five-step, “safe harbor” procedure for plan sponsors and their advisors to follow in order to satisfy their fiduciary responsibilities when selecting and monitoring an annuity provider and contract for benefit distributions from DC plans. (Note: The DOL is contemplating proposed amendments to the annuity selection safe harbor related to the assessment of an annuity provider’s ability to make all future payments.)

According to DOL Reg. 2550.404(a)-4, issued in 2008, and as further clarified by DOL Field Assistance Bulletin 2015-02, in order to satisfy the safe harbor selection process a plan fiduciary must

  1. Engage in an objective, thorough and analytical search for the purpose of identifying and selecting providers from which to purchase annuities;
  2. Appropriately consider information sufficient to assess the ability of the annuity provider to make all future payments under the annuity contract;
  3. Appropriately consider the cost (including fees and commissions) of the annuity contract in relation to the benefits and administrative services to be provided under such contract;
  4. Appropriately conclude that, at the time of the selection, the annuity provider is financially able to make all future payments under the annuity contract and the cost of the annuity contract is reasonable in relation to the benefits and services to be provided under the contract; and
  5. If necessary, consult with an appropriate expert or experts for purposes of compliance with these provisions.

The safe harbor rule provides that “the time of selection” means:

  • the time that the annuity provider and contract are selected for distribution of benefits to a specific participant or beneficiary; or
  • the time that the annuity provider is selected to provide annuities as a distribution option for participants or beneficiaries to choose at future dates.

The fiduciary must periodically review the continuing appropriateness of the conclusion that the annuity provider is financially able to make all future payments under the annuity contract, as well as the reasonableness of the cost of the contract in relation to the benefits and services to be provided. The fiduciary is not, however, required to review the appropriateness of its conclusions with respect to an annuity contract purchased for any specific participant or beneficiary.

Conclusion

Similar to selecting plan investments, choosing an annuity provider for a DC plan is a fiduciary function, subject to ERISA’s standards of prudence and loyalty. One way to satisfy this fiduciary responsibility is to follow the DOL’s safe harbor selection process as outlined in DOL Reg. 2550.404(a)-4 and Field Assistance Bulletin 2015-02.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Deadlines for Adopting 401(k) Safe Harbor Provisions

Is it too late to establish as 401(k) safe harbor plan for 2018?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business. A recent call with a financial advisor from New York is representative of a common inquiry related to adopting 401(k) safe harbor provisions.

Highlights of the Discussion

The answer is highly dependent on your client’s current plan situation. Generally, a plan sponsor that intends to use the standard 401(k) safe harbor provisions[1] for a plan year must adopt those provisions before the first day of that plan year (i.e., adopt safe harbor provisions in 2017, effective for 2018). However, there are some exceptions for 1) newly established 401(k) plans, 2) newly established employers, 3) businesses that already have a profit sharing plan in place and 4) sponsors who follow the “maybe provisions” (see Treasury Regulation  1.401(k)-3(e)(2), IRS Notice 98-52, Section X  and IRS Notice 2000-3).

Employer With No 401(k) Plan

The IRS requires the first plan year of a newly established safe harbor 401(k) plan (other than a successor plan) to be at least three months long. For example, No Plan, Inc., has been around as a business for several years, but does not have a 401(k) plan. As long as No Plan, Inc., sets up a safe harbor 401(k) plan by October 1, 2018, and satisfies the notice requirements, the business can operate the safe harbor 401(k) plan during the last three months of 2018.

Employer Created Within Last Three Months of the Year

The initial year of a safe harbor 401(k) plan can be shorter than three months in the case of a newly established employer, as long as the business establishes the plan as soon as administratively feasible after the employer comes into existence. For example, New Biz is incorporated on November 1, 2018. New Biz can establish a safe harbor 401(k) plan that operates for the last two months of 2018.

Employer With a Profit Sharing Plan

An employer can convert an existing profit sharing plan to a safe harbor 401(k) plan during the current year as long as the plan will function as a safe harbor 401(k) plan for at least three months. For example, PSP, LLC, has had a profit sharing plan since 2016. As long as PSP amends its current profit sharing plan to add the 401(k) safe harbor features by October 1, 2018, and satisfies the notice requirements, the business can operate the safe harbor 401(k) features during the last three months of 2018.

Employer That Follows the “Maybe” Provisions

A 401(k) plan can be amended as late as 30 days prior to the end of a plan year to use a safe harbor nonelective contribution method for that plan year, provided that a regular safe harbor notice (with modified content) was given to eligible employees before the beginning of the plan year and a supplemental notice is given no later than 30 days before the end of the plan year. For example, Maybe So, Inc., maintains a calendar-year 401(k) plan for 2018. Maybe So wanted to have the flexibility to decide toward the end of 2018 whether or not to adopt a 401(k) safe harbor nonelective contribution method, so it provided an initial safe harbor notice with the appropriately altered information before the beginning of the plan year (i.e., in 2017). Consequently, Maybe So can decide no later than December 1 of 2018 to 1) amend the 401(k) plan accordingly and 2) provide a supplemental notice to all eligible employees stating that a three-percent safe harbor nonelective contribution will be made for the plan year.

Conclusion

Generally, in order to use 401(k) safe harbor provisions, a plan sponsor must adopt them before the beginning of the plan year. However, even though it is late in 2018, it may not be too late to take advantage of 401(k) safe harbor provisions for 2018 in certain circumstances.

[1] Mandatory employer matching contribution or nonelective contribution

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved
Print Friendly Version Print Friendly Version

Safe Harbor Validation of Rollovers

“What responsibility does a plan sponsor have in validating whether an incoming rollover contribution is legitimate?”

ERISA consultants at the Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other types of retirement savings and income plans, including nonqualified plans, Social Security and Medicare. We bring Case of the Week to you to highlight the most relevant topics affecting your business. A recent call with a financial advisor from Texas is representative of a common inquiry related to rollover contributions.

Highlights of Discussion

A qualified retirement plan isn’t required to accept rollover contributions from other plans or IRAs, but if it does under the terms of its governing plan document, the incoming assets must consist of valid rollover amounts. In order for the plan to retain its tax-preferred status, the plan sponsor must reasonably conclude that an amount is a valid rollover contribution as defined in Treasury Regulation Section (Treas. Reg. §) 1.401(a)(31)–1, Q&A–14(b)(2) and retain documentation. The IRS has provided examples of what would constitute proof of a valid rollover, including safe harbor options detailed in IRS Revenue Ruling 2014-9 .

Historically, plan sponsors followed the guidance of Treas. Reg. 1.401(a)(31)-1, Q&A-14(b)(2) for acceptable forms of documentation, which include a participant providing the sponsor of the receiving plan with a letter from the plan sponsor of the distributing plan that states the distributing plan has received a determination letter from the IRS or that the plan, to the best of the sponsor’s knowledge, is qualified. Further guidance from IRS Form 5310, Application for Determination for Terminating Plan, states a sponsor  who is filing this form is required to “… submit proof that any rollovers or asset transfers received were from a qualified plan or IRA.” The instructions to the form indicate that a copy of the distributing plan’s determination letter and timely interim amendments is one example of acceptable proof.

For an indirect rollover where a plan participant has received the assets from a distributing plan or IRA and, within 60-days, rolls over the amount to the receiving plan the individual can certify that the distribution is eligible for rollover and was received not more than 60 days before the date of the rollover. Many plans use a type of standard rollover certification form for this purpose. If the rollover contribution is late, the plan sponsor can accept the contribution if the individual has a waiver from the IRS or self-certifies under Revenue Procedure 2016-47.

In addition to the methods listed in the regulations, IRS Revenue Ruling 2014-9 provides additional streamlined safe harbor due diligence procedures described below that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, will allow the sponsor of the plan receiving the rollover to reasonably conclude that the amount is a valid rollover contribution.

Plan-to-Plan Rollovers

The sponsor of the receiving plan can confirm the previous employer’s plan is intended to be qualified by looking up the plan on the DOL’s EFAST2 website. If Code 3C appears on the plan’s most recent Form 5500 filing, then the plan IS NOT intended to be qualified under IRC Code §§ 401, 403, or 408, indicating that a distribution from the plan would not be eligible for rollover.

If the receiving plan receives a check made payable to the trustee of the plan for the benefit of the participant from the trustee of another qualified plan, it is reasonable for the receiving plan sponsor to conclude that the plan that initiated the rollover determined the distribution is an eligible rollover distribution.

IRA-to-Plan Rollovers

When a receiving plan gets a check that is made payable to the trustee of the plan from the trustee of an IRA for the benefit of an employee, the recipient plan administrator may reasonably conclude that the source of the funds is a traditional IRA and not an inherited IRA and, therefore, eligible for rollover.

Keep copies of documentation

As proof rollover amounts were valid, plan sponsors should keep copies of the following items:

  • Checks or check stubs with identifying information;
  • Confirmations of wire or other electronic transfers; and
  • Participant certifications.

Special considerations for RMDs

Required minimum distributions (RMDs) are not eligible rollover distributions. A qualified plan is responsible for ensuring that any RMDs are paid to plan participants. Therefore, the IRS has indicated it is reasonable for the receiving plan to conclude that the distributing plan has already paid to the participant any RMDs and remaining amounts are eligible for rollover.

In contrast, IRA trustees and custodians are not responsible for automatically distributing RMDs to IRA owners. Therefore, a plan sponsor may not reasonably conclude that an IRA rollover consists only of eligible rollover funds. The plan administrator should seek additional documentation to confirm that the IRA owner has satisfied any RMD that may be due.

Conclusion

When rollovers to a qualified plan are permitted, plan sponsors must ensure such incoming amounts are, indeed, eligible for roll over. Validation can be done through employee certification of the source of the funds for a 60-day rollover; verification of the payment source (via information on the incoming rollover check or wire transfer) from the participant’s IRA or former plan; or, if the funds are from a plan, looking up that plan’s Form 5500 filing for assurance that the plan is intended to be a qualified plan.

© Copyright 2024 Retirement Learning Center, all rights reserved